Technical documentation
The technical documentation — usually called the technical file — is the body of evidence that demonstrates a product's conformity with the applicable EU harmonisation legislation. Its general contents are specified in Annex II of Decision No 768/2008/EC (Module A, point 2) and in the equivalent provisions of every sectoral directive and regulation. The technical file is not submitted to any authority on its own initiative. It is held by the manufacturer (or, where mandated, its authorised representative) and produced on reasoned request to a competent national authority.
The technical documentation underpins the manufacturer's EU Declaration of Conformity. Missing or incomplete technical documentation is a formal non-compliance in its own right, even if the product itself is safe (Decision 768/2008/EC, Annex I, Article R34).
Legal basis
- Decision No 768/2008/EC, Annex II, Module A (general contents); each sectoral act adopts these provisions and adds specifics.
- Sectoral Annexes — e.g., Annex IV of Regulation (EU) 2023/1230 (Machinery); Annex II of Regulation (EU) 2017/745 (Medical Devices); Annex II of Directive 2014/30/EU (EMC).
- Regulation (EU) 2019/1020 on market surveillance, Article 4 (the "responsible person" obligation to make documentation available) and Article 7 (cooperation duties).
Scope and applicability
Every product placed on the EU market that bears CE marking must have a corresponding technical file. The file is compiled before the product is placed on the market — not after a market surveillance request arrives. It is updated for each variant of the product that materially differs in design, materials, function, or intended use. A single technical file may cover a family of products provided their conformity-relevant features are identical and any differences are documented.
The file must be obtainable from within the EU. Since 16 July 2021, Article 4 of Regulation (EU) 2019/1020 requires that for products covered by 18 listed Union harmonisation acts (including the LVD, EMC, RED, Machinery, PPE, Toy Safety, RoHS, and others), an economic operator established in the Union must ensure that the technical documentation can be made available to authorities on request (Article 4(3)). That operator is the manufacturer if established in the EU; otherwise the importer, an authorised representative, or, failing those, a fulfilment service provider (Article 4(2)).
General contents
The Module A baseline (Annex II of Decision 768/2008/EC) requires the technical documentation to make it possible to assess the product's conformity. It must include an adequate analysis of the risks and, as applicable, the following. Item 6 is not in the Module A list, but some acts require it (for example Directive 2014/53/EU, Annex V).
- A general description of the product. Name, model number, intended use, variants, target users.
- Conceptual design and manufacturing drawings. Schemes of components, sub-assemblies, circuits, hydraulic and pneumatic diagrams.
- Descriptions and explanations necessary to understand those drawings and the operation of the product.
- A list of harmonised standards applied in full or in part, referenced as published in the OJEU (year and dated edition), and descriptions of solutions adopted to meet essential requirements where standards have not been applied.
- Results of design calculations, examinations carried out, and test reports.
- A copy of the EU Declaration of Conformity.
Risk assessment as part of the file
The Decision 768/2008/EC baseline itself requires the technical documentation to include "an adequate analysis and assessment of the risk(s)" (Annex II, Module A, point 2), so the risk assessment is part of the technical file under every act built on that model. The Machinery Regulation (Annex IV, Part A, point (b)), the Medical Devices Regulation (Annex II, Section 5), the Low Voltage Directive (Annex III, point 2), and the PPE Regulation (Annex III, point 1(b)) each require it expressly; for toys the equivalent is the safety assessment (Regulation 2025/2509, Article 25 and Annex V, from 1 August 2030). The Machinery Regulation goes furthest: the file must list the applicable essential health and safety requirements and describe the protective measures implemented for each.
Sector-specific additions
Each sectoral act adds specific items to the file. The most consequential additions:
Machinery Regulation (EU) 2023/1230 (and Directive 2006/42/EC)
Annex IV, Part A of the Regulation requires, among other items: a complete description of the machinery and its intended use; the risk assessment documentation; design and manufacturing drawings; the harmonised standards or common specifications applied; reports and results of calculations, tests and inspections; the means used to ensure production conformity; a copy of the instructions; for series production, the internal measures that keep it in conformity; and, on reasoned request where necessary, the source code or programming logic of safety-related software. Until 20 January 2027, Annex VII of Directive 2006/42/EC applies. Partly completed machinery has an EU Declaration of Incorporation (Annex V, Part B) and its own list in Annex IV, Part B.
Medical Devices Regulation (EU) 2017/745
Annex II of MDR lists the most extensive technical documentation requirements in EU law: device description and specification (Section 1); information to be supplied by the manufacturer (Section 2); design and manufacturing information (Section 3); general safety and performance requirements (Section 4, mapped against Annex I); benefit-risk analysis and risk management (Section 5); product verification and validation, including clinical evaluation per Annex XIV (Section 6). Annex III adds post-market surveillance documentation including the post-market surveillance plan and Periodic Safety Update Report (Article 86) for Class IIa, IIb, and III devices.
Radio Equipment Directive 2014/53/EU
Annex V adds to the general elements: photographs or illustrations of external features, marking and internal layout; versions of software or firmware affecting compliance; user information and installation instructions; a copy of the EU Declaration of Conformity; and, under Module B, a copy of the EU-type examination certificate.
Toy Safety Regulation (EU) 2025/2509
From 1 August 2030, Article 27 and Annex V require: a detailed description of the design and manufacture, including lists of components, materials, substances and mixtures; the safety assessment under Article 25; a description of the conformity assessment procedure; the addresses of the places of manufacture and storage; and test reports or certificates, depending on the route. Until then, Directive 2009/48/EC applies.
Construction Products Regulation (EU) 2024/3110
Article 22(3) requires technical documentation as the basis for the declaration of performance and conformity. It must indicate the declared use, the elements needed to demonstrate performance and conformity, the procedures in place, the applicable assessment and verification system (Annex IX), any simplified procedures applied, and the calculation of environmental sustainability performance. Product families not yet moved across remain under Regulation 305/2011.
Retention period
The default rule is ten years after the product has been placed on the market (Decision 768/2008/EC, Annex II, Module A, point 4.2; repeated in sectoral acts), which the Blue Guide reads as the last item of the product model. Specific rules:
- Medical devices: at least 10 years for non-implantable devices, at least 15 years for implantable devices (Regulation (EU) 2017/745, Article 10(8)).
- In vitro diagnostic medical devices: at least 10 years (Regulation (EU) 2017/746, Article 10(7)).
- Construction products: 10 years under Regulation 2024/3110 (Article 20(4)).
- Pressure equipment: 10 years under Directive 2014/68/EU (Article 6(3)).
Retention runs from the last unit placed on the market, not from the date of compilation. For a product manufactured continuously over several years, the retention clock starts only when production ends.
Language and format
Documents supplied to an authority must be in a language it can easily understand (Decision 768/2008/EC, Annex I, Article R2(9); Regulation (EU) 2019/1020, Article 4(3)(b)). A file does not need to be kept in every Member State language, but a translation may be needed when an authority asks.
The file may be kept in paper or electronic form. Electronic format is the practical norm. Access controls must allow rapid retrieval and transmission to authorities. Where the file references documents held elsewhere (test reports at laboratories, certificates at Notified Bodies), those references must be traceable; the manufacturer remains responsible for producing the underlying evidence.
Access by market surveillance authorities
Under Article 4(3)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2019/1020, the economic operator established in the EU must, further to a reasoned request from a market surveillance authority, provide the information and documentation needed to demonstrate conformity. Most sectoral acts do not fix a period — for example, Article 6(9) of Directive 2014/35/EU (LVD) does not — and authorities generally set their own deadline in the request; the Medical Devices Regulation has its own rule (Article 10(14)).
A request need not be motivated by suspicion of non-compliance. Authorities may conduct random sampling checks or thematic campaigns. Failure to produce the file may itself be sanctioned (see penalties for incorrect CE marking). If documentation remains unavailable or incomplete, the authority can restrict the product or require its withdrawal or recall (Article R34).
Common errors
- No risk assessment in the file. Even where risks were considered in practice, the file must show the analysis in writing.
- List of standards without dated editions. A reference to "EN 60335-1" without the year and amendment number is unverifiable. The file must cite the exact edition, as referenced in the OJEU where presumption of conformity is claimed.
- Test reports from non-accredited or non-relevant laboratories. A report produced to a standard that does not match the applicable harmonised standard, or by a laboratory that cannot show its competence, has limited evidential value.
- Failure to update the file when standards are revised. Standards are revised regularly. A file citing a withdrawn harmonised standard does not benefit from the presumption of conformity. Manufacturers must take account of changes in standards (Decision 768/2008/EC, Annex I, Article R2(4)), so OJEU references should be re-checked for continuing production.
- Treating "private label" repackaging as outside scope. An economic operator placing a product on the market under its own name or trade mark becomes the manufacturer (Decision 768/2008/EC, Article R6) and must hold a full technical file. Receiving a file from the original manufacturer "for reference" is insufficient; the file must support the rebranded product specifically.
- Cross-border retention without a responsible person. Files held only at the non-EU manufacturer's premises do not satisfy Article 4 of Regulation 2019/1020. An EU-established economic operator must be in a position to produce the file.
Relationship to the Declaration of Conformity
The EU Declaration of Conformity is signed on the basis of the technical file, not the other way round. By signing, the manufacturer states that conformity has been demonstrated, so the file must exist and support each statement in the Declaration. The Declaration comes after compliance has been demonstrated (Decision 768/2008/EC, Annex I, Article R2(2)).
Relationship to Notified Body certificates
Where a Notified Body has been involved, the certificates issued by the body — EU type-examination certificates under Module B, quality assurance approval certificates under Modules D, E, H — form part of the technical documentation. The Notified Body retains its own dossiers, but the manufacturer must hold copies and produce them on request. Certificates have validity dates and renewal requirements that the manufacturer must track.
Frequently asked questions
Do I have to send the technical file to an authority or the EU?
No. There is no filing or registration step for the file. You keep it and provide it when a competent authority makes a reasoned request. A Notified Body reviews it only where your conformity assessment route involves one.
Can one technical file cover several product variants?
Yes, if the file identifies each variant and the differences are documented. A variant that changes design, materials, function or intended use in a way that matters for conformity needs its own assessment within the file.
Who keeps the file if the manufacturer is outside the EU?
The manufacturer stays responsible for it. Under Article 4 of Regulation (EU) 2019/1020, an economic operator established in the EU must also be able to make it available to authorities.
Does the technical file have to be in English?
No single language is prescribed. It must be supplied in a language the requesting authority can easily understand, which may mean translating parts of it.
Sources
- Decision No 768/2008/EC, Annex II — EUR-Lex.
- Regulation (EU) 2019/1020, Articles 4 and 7 — EUR-Lex.
- Directive 2014/53/EU (Radio Equipment), Annex V — EUR-Lex.
- Regulation (EU) 2023/1230 (Machinery), Annex IV — EUR-Lex.
- Regulation (EU) 2017/745 (Medical Devices), Annex II — EUR-Lex.
- Commission Notice — Blue Guide 2022, Section 4.3 — EUR-Lex.